|
An
Introduction
This is the first in a series of books that will present a
more balanced, less canonical approach to what are known as
“The Lost Books of the Bible”. Theological study is generally
done within a very clear set of perameters, formed by the
church sponsoring the work, or the religious persuasion of the
theologians involved. Such study is seldom done to question
the church in any way; the proof being in the staying power of
orthodox doctrine. One of those very solid doctrines in
mainstream Bible-based religion is the acceptance of the books
that compromise those Bibles. This work challenges the very
authority controlling the list of “acceptable books”, and the
reasons those authorities use for the content of that list.
We start this series with the books known as the
Apocrypha. Researching the concepts for the absence of these
books will lead one through a plethora of reasoning. The
arguments range from the dubious claims that they are
forgeries to the more honest ones stating that the church has
the right to exclude anything it wants. Fact seems to play no
part in the debate.
Perhaps one of the best kept secrets of the modern
Protestant Church is that the Bible used by that body is not
the original King James Bible. That translation, completed in
1611, and the Bibles published for the use of the clergy and
the church members until late in the 19th Century contained 80
books. Attempts to remove the 14 books known as the Apocrypha
from the Bible began immediately after the King James
translation was completed. Despite those efforts, they
remained in the Bible until the end of the 19th Century.
There is no doubt that the 14 books of the Apocrypha were
controversial, but it cannot be denied they were included in
the original King James Bible.
Any concept or discussion in the Protestant Church
about the Apocrypha is virtually non-existent, with the
general understanding that only the Catholic Church uses it.
Even this is a mistake, as the
Catholic Bible, The Douay-Rhimes,
does not contain all of the Books of the Apocrypha found
in the original King James
Bible. Here is a comparison:
|
The King James
|
The Douay-Rhimes |
|
1st Esdras
2nd Esdras
(or 4 Ezra)
Tobit
Judith
The Wisdom of Solomon
Ecclesiasticus
(Or The Wisdom of Jesus Son Sirach)
Baruch
1st Maccabees
2nd Maccabees
Add to Esther
Letter of Jeremiah
Prayer of Azariah
(Or Song of
the Three Young Men)
Susanna
Bel and the Dragon
Prayer of Manasseh
Not in
the Douay-Rhimes
Add to
Esther
Letter of Jeremiah
Prayer of Azariah
Susanna
Bel and the Dragon
Prayer of Manasseh
2nd Esdras
|
1st Esdras
2nd Esdras
(This is the book of Nehemia)
Tobias
Judith
Wisdom of Solomon
Ecclisiasticus (Or
The Wisdom of Jesus Son Sirach)
Baruch
1st Maccabees
2nd Maccabees
Abdias
(This is the Book of Obadiah)
Micheas
(This is the Book of Micah)
Aggeus
(This is the Book of Haggai)
Not in
the King James
Abdias
Micheas
Aggeus
|
One would be hard-pressed to find
any members of the clergy even aware that these books were
ever included in the King James Bible. There are 155,683
words, and over 5,700 verses contained in 168 chapters now
missing from the King James translation of the Bible due to
the exclusion of the Apocrypha.
Although this only happened just
over a hundred years ago, their existence as fully accepted
scripture is virtually unknown. The only reason any
knowledgeable Protestant can find for the books of the
Apocrypha being absent from the Bible is that they are not in
the Bible. Some think they are not in the King James Bible
because they are in the Catholic Bible, which is a moot point
because most of the books in the King James Bible are also in
the Catholic Bible. Still others declare them worthless
despite never having read a single sentence from one of them.
Part 2
|